![]() ![]() Its a great cash cow for developers and software companies but it does not fit the average consumer. Whether its Apple or Adobe I don't like eternal lifetime contracts to rent or lease software. And to an extent the ongoing now lifetime monthly or annual fees. The goal was to put family history libraries of photographs and documents onto hard drives that could be cloned over time unti there is a stable long term drive option. ![]() Peter Krogh is why I got into Lightroom and built an extensive photogrpahy digitization studio. I see it more as the VHS BETA wars of the mid 1970s. But the reality is I'd like a software that runs on my computer to keep track of an extensive photography library and create catalogs of grouped searchable content. Lightroom is an exceptioal product if set up correctly on whatever machine. Going back to the PC world it not a good process either. Adobe was but whatever the arguement of the chicken or the egg soured our relationships. Admittedly iPhoto in all its variatinos and Apreture were not good applications. Most of us just want to use a dependable software from machine to machine and keep track of our photo libraries. But this subscription based era or decade is increasingly more complicated. I came from the PC world in the mid 1990s to Apple and for a while enjoyed PhotoShop, Illustrator, and After Effects. Most of us are not computer or software specialsts especially relating to OS. Its been along and frusrating relationship between Adobe and Apple users. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |